<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener("load", function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <iframe src="http://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID=16660456&amp;blogName=The+Fischbowl&amp;publishMode=PUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT&amp;navbarType=BLUE&amp;layoutType=CLASSIC&amp;searchRoot=http://thefischbowl.blogspot.com/search&amp;blogLocale=en_US&amp;homepageUrl=http://thefischbowl.blogspot.com/&amp;vt=-6046363915374505262" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" height="30px" width="100%" id="navbar-iframe" allowtransparency="true" title="Blogger Navigation and Search"></iframe> <div></div>

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Who's the Teacher? You're the Teacher.

Watch this TED talk from TED founder Chris Anderson. Go ahead, I'll wait.




I'm not going to say too much about this other than I'm just going to pull a few quotes from this to ponder.
Crowd accelerated innovation.
(Or, perhaps Crowd Accelerated Innovation, deserving of capital letters?)

It's the crowd, that shines the light, and fuels the desire . . .This is a model that pretty much any organization could use to nurture its own cycle of crowd accelerated innovation . . . Invite the crowd, let in the light, and dial up the desire.
(Schools? Education? Individuals? Learning?)

You have to show your stuff to the world . . . Radical openness.
(Radical. Openness. Is there anything more unlike what most schools/classrooms look like today? And do we think programs like Race to the Top are going to make things more open, more collaborative? Or less?)

We’re a social species. We spark off one another.
(Oy. Back to the drawing board for my Algebra class. I have to do better.)

We watch 80 million hours of YouTube every day . .. Cisco predicts that in 4 years, more than 90% of the web will be video.
(And more video has been uploaded to YouTube in the last two months than has been broadcast by ABC, NBC and CBS combined since ABC started broadcasting . . . in 1948.)

It’s in that non-verbal portion, there’s some serious magic.
(I like to think my writing is sometimes good, and I don't think anyone is saying that writing is going away, but he has a point.)

Reading and writing are actually relatively recent inventions. Face to face communication has been fine-tuned by millions of years of evolution . . . This is the connective tissue of the human super-organism in action.
(I have to think about the idea of "connective tissue" a little bit more, but shades of Clay Shirky here - both Here Comes Everybody and Cognitive Surplus.)

Print scaled. The world’s ambitious innovators and influencers now could get their ideas to spread far and wide. . . But now, in the blink of the eye, the game has changed again. . . . what Gutenberg did for writing, online video can do for face to face communication . . . that primal medium which your brain is exquisitely wired for just went global. (Wow. Shades of both Shirky and Steven Johnson here.)

For the first time in human history talented students don’t have to have their potential and their dreams written out of history by lousy teachers. (I, of course, don't love that line, but I get the point. I would say it more like, "For the first time in human history talented learners don't have to have their potential and their dreams written out of history by lousy circumstances," but, yeah, okay. Also see Disrupting Class.)

Who's the teacher? You're the teacher. ('Nuff said.)

Labels: , , , , ,

Add this post to Del.icio.us

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Monday, September 27, 2010

IKEA and Geothermal Energy: Skyping with Ms. Anderson

IKEA is in the process of building a giant store about five miles from my school. This is no ordinary store construction, however, as they are putting in a geothermal energy system to help heat and cool the store. When I saw the article about it, I thought this would be another good opportunity for my students to Skype with someone, so I tracked down the contact info of the engineer from NREL that was mentioned in the article. She kindly agreed and the Skype session will happen this Wednesday.

You can read the background info we provided to my students on the class blog, and here are the questions we'll be asking:
  1.  How do you define “math?” How would you describe what “math” is to non-engineers? Me

  2. What is the difference between geothermal energy and other forms of energy? Grant

  3. How does the temperature change from the winter to summer underground, and how effective is the water being pumped to control the temperature of the building, especially due to the bipolar weather of Colorado? Alex

  4. Do you think that this system could one day be in the average American home? Why or why not? Jordan

  5. When you were in school getting all those different degrees, did you know that you would be doing everything you are? Did you ever want to start all over? Becca

  6. Two part question: Out of everything you have done and will do in your life, what would you want a youth to remember out of it all? With all your work with renewable energy/heat pump technology what are you most happy about doing and what are some ideas you have to work on in the future? Jessica

If all goes well, I'm hoping to ustream it as well, so you're welcome to tune in on our ustream channel. We'll be skyping from approximately 9:35 - 10:00 am Mountain Time (PLC day for us, so late start) on Wednesday, September 29th.

Update 9-29-10: Archive of the ustream.

Labels: ,

Add this post to Del.icio.us

3 Comments:

Blogger BenH said...

Mr. Smith in the science department actually is (or was?) doing some pretty cool work with NREL that also relates to energy consumption in large stores, if I remember correctly.

9/29/10 12:27 AM  
Blogger KayZ315 said...

This is excellent!! I am a teacher in PA who will be attending training for PLP. My school has received Netbooks for the upper grades to use. I am looking forward to obtaining a skype account so that I can integrate Math and Science in ways like these. (I teach both subjects.)

9/29/10 8:00 PM  
Blogger Toni Chant said...

Thank you for sharing your valuable time with us this morning talking about the potential of Skype within our classrooms.

Toni Chant
Chets Creek Elementary
Jacksonville, Florida

10/12/10 5:07 PM  

Post a Comment

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Welcome Sunday Telegraph and Daniel Pink Blog Readers

If you’re visiting this blog for the first time due to this article in the Sunday Telegraph or this post on Daniel Pink’s blog, welcome. As Mr. Pink thankfully mentioned in both places, I did not originate the idea of flipping homework and lectures. Many other folks are doing this also and, frankly, most of them are doing it better than I am. Two of the teachers I know that have done the most work in this area are Jonathan Bergmann and Aaron Sams – you might check out some of their work. (And, if you’re a teacher that’s also using video in a similar way and you threw up a little when Daniel Pink chose to link to me, please leave a link to your work in the comments so people can perhaps take a look.)

If you’re interested in learning more about my partial return to the math classroom, you can check out all the posts related to that endeavor and/or the Transparent Algebra blog.

If you’re visiting for my other claim to my fifteen minutes of fame, you might check out the Shift Happens wiki or the last blog post I wrote about that to learn more about Did You Know?/Shift Happens.

If you’re interested in what else goes on around here, then look around a bit. My blogging has tapered off lately as budget cuts have added a bit to my plate, but you might be interested in the Best (?) Posts of 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 to get a feel for the place.

Labels: , ,

Add this post to Del.icio.us

2 Comments:

Blogger Margaret Haviland said...

Having just given one of my vey few lectures of the year, and one of my favorites as my students always ask questions, I wonder what would be lost were I to have recorded it and uploaded it to Youtube. Instead of engaging with students around questions of Puritan theology and Puritan sexual mores and living practices they would have simply looked at me give the basic lecture without the extra explanations prompted by their questions.
BUT
I would have gained another whole class period to help them in their small groups work through the sermons of the likes of Jonathan Edwards, Charles Chauncy, and William Tennent.
BUT they wouldn't have had the evening to make contributions to the class wiki study guide on our current unit on the peopling of America in 17th and 18 centuries. By using the wiki for the details, we are freed up in class to discuss ideas and work though sermons.

So many choices!

9/23/10 12:56 PM  
Blogger Karl Fisch said...

Margaret- I think there's a big difference between "Puritan theology and Puritan sexual mores" and "Graphing Linear Equations Using Intercepts." I wouldn't suggest moving your lecture to outside of class, although I think it would be cool if you recorded it - and the kids questions - and made it available to them outside of class.

For classes like Algebra that have many skills they have to master, I think the lectures on YouTube approach makes some sense. For things that are very much discussion based, not so much.

9/23/10 1:08 PM  

Post a Comment

Sunday, September 19, 2010

Dear Denver Post, Would You Be Okay With Us Cheating on the CSAP, Too?

So two weeks ago the Denver Post disappointed us with this headline:
Summer is almost over, and the disappointment about returning to class . . .
Now this week they follow that up with a column about the Derek Jeter cheating incident, where he fooled the umpire into thinking he’d been hit by the ball so that he could get on base instead of making an out. Troy Renck, the Denver Post baseball columnist, had this to say:
All those people who talk about the honor in baseball, I wonder when exactly they watched the game. Don't they realize that third-base coaches used to do cartwheels to try to get pitchers to walk or balk?

. . . I agree it doesn't set a great example for kids. But that's where parents should be able to articulate the difference between professional athletes and youth sports. For the pros, their livelihood depends on the results of the games, not whether they get banned from the orange slices and Capri Suns.

If Jeter is guilty of anything, it's bad acting, not cheating.
Really?

So, what you’re saying is, the more important something is the more okay it is to cheat? Following your logic, then it would be okay for schools and students to cheat on CSAP because most certainly “our livelihood” depends on the results. What you’re saying is, “Hey, he cheated too, so it’s okay for me to cheat!” My fifth grader already knows that’s not a legitimate excuse.

I can’t help but point to the irony of this story being on the facing pace in the print edition of the sports section, with the headline “Question of Honor:”
Undisclosed Creek players conspired to fix results in a preseason intrasquad qualifying "ladder" tournament that determines varsity seedings. Several players were serving suspensions this past week when Creek dropped one match at Fairview and another at home against rival Regis Jesuit.

. . . "What this was for (the players involved) was a life lesson," Cherry Creek spokeswoman Tustin Amole said. "It showed poor sportsmanship and very bad judgment. The school and the athletic director and the principal took this very, very seriously."
So, on the one hand, we have educators at Cherry Creek High School making an unequivocal statement that cheating is not okay. That it’s not only wrong, but that we’ll punish both you and ourselves as an institution to make sure you understand how wrong it is. Then, on the other hand, we have Troy Renck and the Denver Post supporting – no, in fact, promoting – the win at all costs culture that has given us not only Derek Jeter, but also Enron, Lehman Brothers, credit default swaps, and our current economic crisis.

A few years ago Charles Barkley stated that he didn’t want to be a role model for young people. Put me firmly in the camp that believes that all of us: teachers, athletes, coaches, and adults in all manner of occupations should be role models for our young people. And, yes, that includes sports columnists and newspaper editors that are asleep at the switch.

If I asked students at my high school the following question,
In non life-threatening circumstances, and in cases where it’s not a conflict between good and evil (think World War II), is it okay to cheat?
I’m pretty sure that all 2,150 of them would get the correct answer. Now, to be sure, it’s likely that some of them have cheated in a variety of endeavors, but yet they still know it’s wrong. And most of them, like the tennis players at Cherry Creek, know they made a mistake and regret it.

Yet apparently Derek Jeter, Troy Renck and the editors at the Denver Post would disagree with our high school students, and would tell them that, “Yes, it is okay to cheat if the stakes are high enough.” So now those tennis players at Cherry Creek, who got a very clear message from the educators in their lives that cheating is not okay, have to be asking themselves, “Wait. What you’re saying is that what I did wasn’t wrong, I just should’ve been making money off of it?”

In combination with the disappointing headline from two weeks ago, that makes two strikes on you Denver Post. You know what they say in baseball, “Three strikes and you’re out.” Of course, perhaps that doesn’t apply anymore to people like Derek Jeter . . . or Troy Renck.

No, Mr. Renck, I’m not going to “give you a break.” I expect more from you Mr. Renck, and from the Denver Post. As I said a couple of weeks ago, perhaps you should pay closer attention to what you are actually communicating to our young people. That instead of undermining what we are trying to teach our students about respect and responsibility, about right and wrong, about honor and doing the right thing even when no one is looking (and that includes umpires), perhaps you should try to support us.

If you have an opinion on this, feel free to leave a comment on this post. But, perhaps more importantly, feel free to contact the Denver Post with your thoughts.
Troy Renck:   trenck@denverpost.com
Sports Page:   sports@denverpost.com or sportsletters@denverpost.com
Dan Haley, editorial page editor:  dhaley@denverpost.com or @danhaleyDP on Twitter
Letters to the Editor:  openforum@denverpost.com or 303-954-1331
Daniel Petty, Denver Post Social Media Editor:  @danielpetty on Twitter

Labels:

Add this post to Del.icio.us

10 Comments:

Blogger Jenny said...

I'm not sure I agree that what Jeter did is cheating. I definitely think it is uncool (I'm struggling to come up with a better word but, so far, that best describes my thinking).

Pitchers fake a throw to first to keep a runner from stealing second. Quarterbacks fake throws to receivers. A part of sports is convincing others that things are different than they really are. Jeter did that. I think he crossed a line, but I don't think he cheated.

As to the writing about school beginning - that drives me crazy. The great majority of kids, in my experience, actually enjoy school. I don't understand why, we as a society, feel a need to portray school in a negative light. I see it often in TV shows and movies.

9/19/10 2:09 PM  
Blogger Karl Fisch said...

Jenny - I would say your two examples are within the rules of the game, they are misdirection. Mr. Jeter knew he didn't get hit by the ball. Not only did he know he didn't get hit by the ball, he actively tried to convince the umpire he did. That's not within the rules of the game.

That's. Cheating.

How refreshing would it be to see an umpire make a bad call and the professional athlete stand up and say, "Nope, the ball didn't hit me ump."

My guess is that most fans can't even conceive of that happening, and would disagree with it if it did (well, if that athlete was on their team they would disagree). The fact that there's even any question about this shows just how far we've gone done the road of "winning isn't everything, it's the only thing."

9/19/10 2:25 PM  
Blogger Jenny said...

I too would love to see that. I agree that we have gone much too far along the road of winning is everything. I'm sure it's a problem those of you in high schools see frequently with sports teams. It's easier to ignore in an elementary school where there is much less competition. Regardless of whether or not I think Jeter cheated (and I'm going to have to give it more thought now), I find the incident depressing.

9/19/10 2:39 PM  
Blogger petedignan said...

Karl, I couldn't agree with you more. In life, as in sports, there are rule of fair play. Working to circumvent those rules has brought us things like Watergate, Enron the Wall Street meltdown that began in 2008. Adults are all role models for kids. They pay WAY more attention to what we do than what we say.

9/19/10 3:34 PM  
Blogger RichTCS said...

I was actually watching that game and saw the incident live. Jeter was completely lying to the umpire by acting like he got hit, particularly after Joe Maddon (Rays manager) went out to argue the call with all four umpires - and was subsequently ejected from the game for being RIGHT. The person who was correct was ejected from the game, and the liar was awarded first base (and subsequently scored a run, which thankfully didn't wind up costing the Rays the game). If that's not cheating, I'm not sure what is.

A columnist who asserts otherwise clearly has a big challenge with understanding his ethics. While I don't live anywhere near Denver, I am very disappointed that anyone who would consider himself a journalist would have such an immature perspective on truth and lies.

9/19/10 6:26 PM  
Blogger Scott McLeod said...

What's the over/under (including NEVER) on how long it will be before you hear from the Denver Post on this? After all, this isn't a letter to the editor... ;)

9/19/10 11:07 PM  
Blogger SmilesTeach said...

Bravo, Karl Fisch,
for not equivocating on questions of honesty and fairness. This whole conversation connects with live wires to Thomas Friedman's article "Easy Street Put U.S. Values in the Ditch," in which he quotes Washington Post columnist Robert Samuelson, suggesting that perhaps student motivation has been influenced by the values breakdown we've witnessed in the banking sector and other shining pinnacles of corporate America (what kind of cash can I get away with, even if it causes the downfall of the entire company & the loss of thousands of jobs??). Check out Alfie Kohn's scathing response to Samuelson's assertion while you're at it, and you'll have a pretty good dialogue. Kohn's take is that extrinsic "motivators" actually undermine intrinsic motivation, which he's written about convincingly in his previous books. Well, as far as extrinsic vs. intrinsic, where do we put the desire to win, or get an A, or get away with a huge load of cash? Extrinsic. And where do we put the sense of fairness & honesty, justice & compassion? Intrinsic. So perhaps Samuelson, Friedman, & Kohn don't disagree as much as they might appear to. Teachers know that there are lots of students in their classrooms whose primary motivation IS the extrinsic grade, not the learning that should come with it (we call them grade-grubbers), but our challenge is to model (as in role model)the excitement and exhilaration that come with genuine curiosity and learning. We only hope that their parents have done the same throughout their lives, because it really does take a village.

9/20/10 8:32 AM  
Blogger Karl Fisch said...

petedignan - Thanks Pete. Yes, they do pay attention to what we do, and what we say, and try to match them up.

And I don't mean to imply with this post in any way that I'm perfect in this regard, but I try every day to model for my students, and I think the message from this article is confusing at best, and downright undermining at worst.

9/20/10 8:38 AM  
Blogger Karl Fisch said...

Scott McLeod - Well, I did also email this post to the columnist and the editorial page editor (actually, to all the email addresses I included in the post), and @ tweeted the two Twitter addresses.

The columnist replied within 5 minutes saying he would take a look, but I haven't heard anything since. On my previous post about the Post, their social media editor did reply to me on Twitter and said he would "pass it along" to the prep sports people.

So, some response, and I think they're trying to navigate these new spaces, but perhaps they see me as just another angry blogger (which, I suppose, I am).

9/20/10 8:40 AM  
Blogger whitney bosarge said...

Mr. Fisch, I am a student of Dr. Strange's EDM 310 class at the University of South Alabama. I totally agree with you, what Jeter did was wrong. Personally I have never liked the guy, but anyways he is a role model himself for kids, just as much as teachers and others are. I think it should be made a point to the public that cheating is wrong, no matter what your reasons are or how important it is. That tells kids that well hey if it is okay to cheat in sport games, it is okay to cheat in school. That cheats that child out of truly learning something.

9/21/10 8:20 PM  

Post a Comment

Saturday, September 18, 2010

Homecoming Pep Assembly

For those of you who don't work in a high school, you might enjoy this taste of a Homecoming Pep Assembly.

Cheering. Dancing. Singing. Tug-of-War. Centipede Race. The kids are alright.


Labels: , ,

Add this post to Del.icio.us

4 Comments:

OpenID shareski said...

And when schools and districts assume that learning only can take place in classrooms and thus erode things like assembly in order to "protect instructional time", they rob students of living and learning and building a shared culture.

Events like this can never, and should never be measured in terms of outcomes but should be valued and emphasized as acts of community and sharing that every human should participate in.

9/18/10 10:20 AM  
Blogger RichTCS said...

Dang, I watched the whole video but never saw The Who! ;-)

As a middle school teacher, I miss this level of camaraderie and team spirit.

9/19/10 9:38 AM  
Blogger Karl Fisch said...

shareski - Yeah, I hear that.

9/19/10 1:43 PM  
Blogger Karl Fisch said...

RichTCS - Sorry to mislead you on The Who. Yes, it is fun to work in a high school.

9/19/10 1:44 PM  

Post a Comment

Sunday, September 05, 2010

Dear MLA and APA

Two questions.
  1. How often (not counting grad school) have you actually followed a written citation, found the source material, and then read it?

    Gibaldi, Joseph. MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers, Seventh Edition. New York: Modern Language Association, 2007. Print.

  2. How often have you clicked on a link to learn more?
 

    Labels: , ,

    Add this post to Del.icio.us

    15 Comments:

    OpenID MsStewart said...

    I may be in the minority, but I dig up citations and read pretty regularly when planning for class, almost always to Google the title to find the article or book. If that fails, I rarely go and dig the source up.

    While I've modified my practice for some student work, I still sometimes require MLA style citations. This conversation and my frustration with having to use APA style for an article I'm writing have me reconsidering that requirement.

    Are there any times you think APA, MLA, or CMS makes sense to require?

    Meredith
    @msstewart

    9/5/10 8:14 PM  
    Blogger Karl Fisch said...

    Meredith - I think you probably are in the minority but, again, look at how you find the work. It's not as a result of the citation being in a particular format, it's just because it gave you enough information to Google it (and if someone accidentally used a comma and not a period, it probably didn't prevent you from finding it).

    So, I think citations are good. But I also think they need to change to reflect how folks are actually going to find the original work. Would anyone argue that a simple link to Amazon is more effective if you're trying to find a book than an MLA citation?

    9/5/10 8:21 PM  
    Blogger Matt Townsley said...

    Hold on. I'm going to link to this post to drive some traffic your way. Do you think MLA and APA will notice?

    9/5/10 9:00 PM  
    Blogger Alexis Walker said...

    I dig up citations often, but I've been terminally socialized by earning a terminal degree. I know where (and how) to find the things that still aren't completely public domain (JSTOR, NCTE journals on-line). And I still keep track of the things I read in bibliographic format - but I use Zotero for it. Sometimes. The last article I read, I wrote out an index card with an MLA-style citation on the top . . .

    9/5/10 9:06 PM  
    Blogger Beth Knittle said...

    I check citations regularly. I like to get as close to the original source as possible. Though I am not a stickler for every comma and period. I believe we have become lazy in our reading and need to question more closely what we read. We tend to easily pass on information (links) with out truly digesting what we share.

    I think the type of citation depends on the final format of the intended product. On the web, then a link is fine. Print material then a more completed citation is required.

    9/6/10 6:36 AM  
    Blogger Karl Fisch said...

    Alexis - For things that aren't linkable, then we definitely need some way to reference them. That's why I said if the citation (link) gets you to the source.

    But I think educators spend most of their time correcting students formatting on the citation instead of helping them understand. I could be wrong, but everyone here who is defending citations seems to be referring to research journals. I was really asking how many times have you followed one of your student's citations?

    As far as those things that aren't available to the public, how much longer are they going to be relevant if they don't begin to make their stuff accessible?

    9/6/10 7:50 AM  
    Blogger Karl Fisch said...

    Matt - Somehow, I don't think MLA and APA are likely to shift course based on this post.

    9/6/10 7:51 AM  
    Blogger Karl Fisch said...

    Beth - Similar to my comment to Alexis, I'm curious how often you follow the citations in your students' work?

    Can't print also include a link? Admittedly, it's not as functional as when it's online, but it still works. And I think that just points out the inherent limitations of the print medium, which is why I believe that anyone who truly wants to help others with their work should be putting it online and making it accessible.

    9/6/10 7:54 AM  
    Blogger monika hardy said...

    Karl - maybe you saw this - but Kevin Washburn just posted http://eduratireview.com/2010/09/do-you-speak-academia/

    i love that we're pushing ourselves into relevance.

    as always - thanks for the great post.

    9/6/10 8:19 AM  
    Blogger CMakovsky said...

    A very clever and amusing post. Wow.

    9/6/10 10:03 AM  
    Blogger Paradox said...

    Axe yoully, sum office due car furry mulch abowt add here ants to standerz thut othurz downt seam two on to pholo. (Apologies to Richard Lederer)

    9/6/10 6:09 PM  
    Blogger Mr. Phillips said...

    I think that if you are writing with the purpose of posting your work online, then linking your resources is much more effective and relevant than providing a list of resources in APA or MLA format.
    From a teaching perspective, why should we be spending time correcting format? Shouldn't we be more interested in content? After all Google just spent millions of dollars to shave seconds off of their search results. Linking resources would save teachers a lot more time than that!

    9/12/10 12:40 PM  
    Blogger Jude said...

    Hi. I'm behind in blog reading, so I just came across this. I also just came across a posting on APA's blog which addresses this: http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2010/09/dear-professor.html

    It points out that APA isn't designed for us--it's designed for publication in scholarly journals. Especially at the high school level, that's a different concern. As a reference librarian, I always tell students that this is how I would interpret the citation rules, but the ultimate judge is the instructor--you're the one with the power to make exceptions, not me. To me, that means you have a lot of leeway in how you choose to have your students apply APA or MLA.

    9/19/10 3:57 PM  
    Blogger Frank LaBanca, Ed.D. said...

    I find this post interesting in the sense that it challenges the value of "educational research - practicing educator" nexus. Are we, as educators, utilizing research-based ideas, challenging our own thinking, and considering alternatives, or do we stick with evidence that is anecdotal?

    On the second point of format, I offer the following thoughts:

    APA format for websites has a lot to offer us (and students) in terms of evaluating quality and validity. It also is much simpler than the MLA format. If we (or students) only provide a web address are we evaluating the source? (a.k.a. what organization or individual authored the content) Are we evaluating how recent the content was written? (e.g., providing a date of posting). Aren't these important factors in information literacy? If we scaffold the learning for students by providing them with a well-established format which requires them to not only read the content, but evaluate it, I think we provide them with better learning strategies.

    Frank LaBanca In Search of Scientific Creativity

    9/20/10 9:49 AM  
    Blogger Roy Petitfils said...

    I agree Karl. I feel that more than anyone else, those in the Ivory tower value MLA, APA. And to hear of students being given ZEROES on major term papers not b/c of an intent to plagiarize but b/c of improper citations just seems silly. And while my 8 years of Grad school gives me an appreciation for the discipline of research and how it helps to form and shape disciplined thinking, perhaps there is a win/win in the citation war that will make academia feel less polarizing to the mass of modern students.

    9/27/10 6:04 AM  

    Post a Comment

    Saturday, September 04, 2010

    Dear Denver Post - You're the Disappointment

    I teach high school. I love all of high school, including high school sports, and including the fun that students have at Friday night (or Thursday night this week for us) football. So I understand the intent of the following headline in The Denver Post.


    But, as it does every year at this time (and several times throughout the year), The Post throws the rest of school under the bus.
    Summer is almost over, and the disappointment about returning to class . . .
    Really?

    Really, Denver Post, that's the message you want to send? With all your whining on the editorial page about the state of our schools (and pretty consistently getting it wrong by the way), you don't feel any responsibility to actually read your own paper and perhaps, just perhaps, make sure you aren't contributing to the anti-education culture of the state of Colorado?

    Not only did school start for most of us quite a while ago, but many of us are excited about returning to school (teachers, administrators, students and parents - apparently everyone except The Denver Post's writers and editors). Yes, I know many high school students won't readily admit to being excited about being back, and certainly students don't love everything about school, but come visit my school and you can feel the excitement. We've got great students, a great staff, and a great community, and we're doing important and meaningful things with students every day (including Friday night football), but you chose to go with "disappointment about returning to class."

    So, as the self-proclaimed Voice of the Rocky Mountain Empire, perhaps you could pay closer attention to the headlines in the section that many students turn to first because it's about them. Because, if you continue to use your "voice" to undermine what we try to do day in and day out, you'll have plenty more to write about on your editorial pages. Of course, maybe that's your intent.

    Labels:

    Add this post to Del.icio.us

    13 Comments:

    Blogger Hatak said...

    Perhaps you should send this to the "Letters to the Editor", if you have not. Or, perhaps this is what they would like you to do so that other people can take it out of context and continue to bash education. I did see that there was a reply on Twitter though.

    -Nice post.

    9/4/10 6:42 PM  
    Blogger Jackson said...

    That is incredible! I can't believe you have to put up with that kind of negativity from the press. It always infuriates me when non-teachers trot out unthinking and usually inaccurate cliches about education, but I can usually excuse it just because I don't take what they say personally and can forgive their ignorance.

    But for this rubbish to come from the press is inexcusable! They really should know better and be held to a higher standard. You would hope that various public institutions could work together regarding things like education, not undermine each other at every turn.

    Shame on you, Denver Post!

    9/4/10 6:44 PM  
    Blogger BenH said...

    Maybe the best thing you can do is continue to give my generation the tools we need to finish of print media once and for all!

    Maybe that's somewhat hyperbolic. But I certainly don't fear for our democracy when Internet media that empowers every day citizens with it's diverse meritocracy causes a self-anointed voice of an empire to go out of print.

    9/4/10 9:36 PM  
    Blogger Herb Schulte said...

    Well said, Karl. Perhaps those at the Denver Post have long forgotten one of the core tenets of journalism, as well as education, accountability, in their zeal to stay popular. It's oh so very easy, as we who work with kids everyday know, to ride along with whatever the trend of the day might be just to be in and cool; or in this case sell papers. So very easy to accept over-crunched statistics as fact, sound bite media propaganda as news, and to wag an accusing finger in the direction of those whose sweat is so often given thanklessly.

    Reminds me of an old saw that seldom seems to lose its edge; if you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.

    Thanks for stepping up, as usual, and calling the Post out. Now it's their turn to step up.

    9/5/10 8:57 AM  
    Blogger Nicole Kelley said...

    That is horrible that a paper would print that! I always (even in college) look forward to school starting back. A lot of other students do too. It sounds like the Denver Post doesn’t know what it is like to be in school. Like you said, you have a great number of people and you are doing important and meaningful things with students. Also, among those important things, you all come together for football games. Football games in school are a way of bringing a school and community together, and that is a wonderful thing!

    The Denver Post obviously needs a wake up call. They most definitely need to see this post and reevaluate their story they printed. Thank you for writing this post it was very good. I enjoy how you voice your opinion.

    9/5/10 2:51 PM  
    Blogger Miss Cheska said...

    Well-said. Have you sent this to the editor? Would also be interesting to see some students reply in regards to their own impressions of being back in school. As a student and now a teacher, I love being back in school because of the excitement of new learning, reconnecting with friends, and making new memories. I'm not sure what this author refers to regarding disappointment, but it perpetuates old negativity about schools.

    9/6/10 9:47 AM  
    Blogger amyw said...

    I really think you should send this to the editor, Mr. Fisch. It would benefit all Denver Post readers to see it as well.

    9/7/10 8:04 AM  
    Blogger Karl Fisch said...

    amyw - It might mean more coming from you . . .

    9/7/10 8:09 AM  
    Blogger amyw said...

    @Karl Fisch - I was appalled when I saw "disappointment about returning to class." Adults, ideally, are supposed to motivate us about going back to school, not call it a disappointment. You'd think someone at the Post would've noticed that...

    9/8/10 7:13 AM  
    Blogger Callie Ramsey said...

    Although I am in college I am always excited about going back to school and I'm very sure I'm not alone with that. Instead of them posting about the enjoyment of school and motivating them to continue higher education this saddens me but I think you commented your frustration with them in a very professional way and maybe they should think about what they write before they decide to print it.

    9/11/10 11:39 AM  
    Blogger Cheryl Capozzoli said...

    Bravo! The atrocity here is the media and politics that continue to undermine Public Education in the US. Sorry to disappoint others, but my three children couldn't wait to get back to school. They missed all of their friends and yes even those so presumed "worthless" public educators. As a dedicated and passionate public educator, I will continue to love waking up everyday to head into schools where I know I can have a profound impact on student learning and success. A much more rewarding experience than so many other professions. Inspiring learning and a passion to teach and empower our youth are not skills that can be tested or measured by standardized test scores. Truly this type of public disappointing attitude will continue to chip away at the free quality education programs that all children have the right to experience. Thanks for your continued inspiration and passion Karl.

    9/11/10 2:19 PM  
    Blogger ashleyjeanann said...

    I think the comment in the Denver Post was very negative. Students are excited about returning to school especially younger students. Printing a comment like can hurt the moral of students. They think that other student's their age are not excited about returning to school so they in turn act like they aren't excited too. Newspapers need to be careful about the way the print things because it can have a very negative impact on schools and children's education.

    9/12/10 11:43 AM  
    Blogger Lawanna Hinton said...

    I think that was such a negative thing to say, considering that we are dealing with adults who should know the importance of education. The media should always show excitement when it come to educating our students, they should realize that comments like that can discourage some students who already need that extra boost when it come to going to school and actually graduating.lawannahintonedm310.blogspot.com

    9/17/10 9:45 AM  

    Post a Comment

    Wednesday, September 01, 2010

    What I Said Today

    [cross-posted on Transparent Algebra]

    Today was our Skype session with Professor Garibaldi, and I thought that went well. After the Skype session we only had about twenty minutes left (shortened classes due to a PLC day) so I took that opportunity to talk with my class a little bit. I realized that I hadn't done a good job of conveying my thoughts and beliefs about the class, of sharing my passion, of explaining why I setup class the way I did and what I was expecting from them - and what I was hoping for them.

    So here, more or less, is what I said. I'm sure it wasn't quite this smooth, as when I write I automatically correct and tweak, but this is pretty close to what I said (and definitely the spirit of what I hope I conveyed).


    I wanted to talk a little bit about this class and why I’m doing the things I’m doing. Mr. Krause, one of our English teachers, is doing a project right now where his students are asking people how they define success. I answered that for several groups of students, but I wanted to talk for a minute about how I’ll decide if I’m successful with you guys in this class.

    I won’t think I’m a success if you get a good grade in Algebra, although I certainly hope you do and I’m going to try really hard to help you do that. I won’t think I’m a success if you score well on tests like CSAP or ACT, although I hope you do, and even though a lot of well-intentioned people think that’s how I should define success. I won’t even think I’m a success if you go to a good college and then get a good job, although I certainly want you to do that because I’d like to retire someday and I need you all to have good jobs to support me.

    No, I’ll consider myself successful if you turn out to be good, kind, caring adults. If you’re a good spouse, child and parent. If you contribute to the world and to your community and help those around you. If you participate. And learn.

    And here’s the deal. The education that I received was a pretty good one. But it’s not good enough for you guys. Not anymore. You see, in a rapidly changing, information abundant world, the people who are going to be successful – both professionally and personally – are the learners. And by “learners” I don’t mean people who just learn what we teach you here at AHS.

    Now, I want to be clear, that doesn’t mean I don’t think you should learn what we teach you here at AHS. I don’t want you to go to your second period teacher, raise your hand, and say, “Mr. Fisch said I don’t need to learn what you’re teaching.” Please, don’t do that. That’s not at all what I’m saying. Your teachers here work very hard trying to share important, meaningful and relevant knowledge and skills. And that’s important, but it’s not enough. Because to be successful in the 21st century you’re going to have to be a learner, you’re going to have to learn how to learn, and go after things on your own. You’re going to have to be independent, curious, passionate learners, who don’t just sit back and wait for someone to tell them what they’re supposed to know, but who go out and try to figure things out for yourself. Who pursue your interests, your goals, your passions with intensity, and who actively participate in everything you do. Who go out and find other learners who are passionate about what you are passionate about and learn from them – and alongside them.

    To quote myself (sorry), the world has shifted. The world of school, and the world of work, and the world in general has shifted, and so I need you to shift as well, and that’s what I’m trying to do in this class. I’m trying to get you to be actively involved in your own education, to be independent and curious learners in mathematics, even if Algebra is never going to be your favorite subject.

    I believe you need the skills I’m trying to get you to learn for three main reasons. First, to be a successful citizen in the 21st century you have to be numerate. In order to deal with all the data that is going to get thrown at you, and to make good, responsible, effective decisions, you’re going to need a lot of the skills we’re learning in Algebra.

    And frankly, that’s not necessarily true about all the math classes you’ll take. Honestly, if you take Trig and Pre-Calc, the skills you learn there are very important if you go into the math and sciences, but perhaps not so much day-to-day life for most of you (some folks will disagree with that). But the skills we learn in Algebra you’ll be using every day to make sense of all that data in the world, to be informed voters and decision makers.

    The second reason to learn the skills is if you decide that you are passionate about math and science, you need these skills in order to progress to more complex topics and to go deeper.

    The third reason – and it’s the one I think is least important but you may think is the most important – is that right now in the short term you have to learn these skills to get a good grade in this class, to do well in school, and to get into college if that’s what you choose. So while I prefer that you focus on the first two reasons, this one is still a valid one for many of you.

    And this is why it’s critical you do the assignments I’m asking you to do, like watching the videos I’ve created for you. Those videos are designed to help you master the skills, and to become more independent learners. But they’re also designed to free up class time so that we can become more curious, active learners, in class, and so we can explore interesting (or not for some of you) applications of Algebra like the bike gear ratios or Tim Tebow’s speed at the NFL Combine or a variety of other activities we’ll be doing this year. In order to apply the skills in class, I need you to do the necessary work outside of class.

    But in order for that to happen, in order for us to use our class time to be the kind of learners I think you need to be to be successful in this century, your century, I need you to step up and take care of business. I need you to watch the videos, and use them as they’re intended, and do the other things I ask you to do outside of class. And I really, really need you to participate in class, to be active learners. To ask questions, and be involved, and talk to each other, and help each other, and be willing to take risks in order to learn more, even if that makes you a little nervous or uncomfortable. I need you to do more of the talking in class, and me to do less. I need you to do more of the thinking, and the questioning, and the figuring out.

    So I’m asking you to please, please consider what kind of future you want, not just for yourself, but for those around you, and make an effort to be as independent, as curious, as responsible, as passionate of a learner that you can be. And I promise that I’ll bring the passion every day and do the very best I can to help you become that learner.

    Labels: , ,

    Add this post to Del.icio.us

    7 Comments:

    Blogger monika hardy said...

    good for you Karl. how lucky your students to have heard that message.

    9/1/10 11:17 PM  
    Blogger m.clarke said...

    This is a great message for all of us to hear and heed. Your students are lucky and so am I, as a professional teacher, to have heard it too. I love my job and I hope I convey my passion and enthusiasm to my students half so well as you did with the discussion you had with them. Thank you again for a wonderful post. You really don't have any idea how inspiring I find them :)

    9/2/10 12:42 AM  
    Blogger Karl Fisch said...

    monika - Thanks.

    9/2/10 9:04 AM  
    Blogger Karl Fisch said...

    m.clarke - Thanks. I appreciate the kind words, but I wonder if the kids find it as "inspiring" as we think (or hope) it is. That's always the struggle for me, what is actually going to help them "get it" in the way I want them to.

    9/2/10 9:05 AM  
    Blogger m.clarke said...

    I completely understand what you mean, Karl, and I wonder the same thing for my students too. Sometimes though, these sorts of messages take time to sink in. The students (particularly during the teenage years) have an image to maintain and unfortunately, for many, disengagement is seen as being the uber-cool thing to be.

    I suspect, however, that the message did sink in, at least for a few and your words and passion that you demonstrate, not only on this particular day, but in the everyday happenings of your classroom, will stick with them. Such is the hope of every teacher, I think. I was fortunate enough to have a couple of previous students tell me they appreciated me a few years after they had been taught by me :) There is no doubt in my mind that you'll experience the same thing, over and over again from your students too.

    9/2/10 9:19 AM  
    Blogger Callie Ramsey said...

    I think this was a great statement to make to your class. By reading this I wish I was there to hear it, I am a education major at South Alabama and today I was watching a few videos for my class and what you said went right along with them. Your students should be very proud to have a teacher like you.

    9/2/10 3:43 PM  
    Blogger Toni Parrish said...

    I am an elementary education student taking edm310 @ USA and I have been assigned to comment on your post. I would like to start off by saying that this was a great post for such a ridiculous statement. I really can't believe that any respectable press would allow something like this to be printed publicly, this goes to show that some people really don't take pride in what they do or say or better yet on how it affects the people around them.

    9/17/10 6:13 PM  

    Post a Comment