Friday, June 22, 2007

Did You Know? 2.0

I blogged previously that XPLANE had offered to make the original Did You Know/Shift Happens presentation more visually appealing. Well, it’s now finished, and you can view it below. For me, this really isn’t a "sequel" to Did You Know, it’s just different. Some folks will prefer the original, some will prefer this version, some will dislike both. For me, it’s just another attempt to create a conversation, so I hope that it does.

XPLANE’s goal was to make it more visually appealing than text on a PowerPoint background, thinking that by adding some graphics and animation that it could convey the message to more folks (particularly folks whose first language is not English).

I (and Scott) had two main goals. First, I wanted to make it less us (as in U.S.) versus them. That wasn’t my intent in the original, but it certainly could be interpreted that way. It still includes some of the U.S./China/India statistics, because we felt those were indicative of the "shifts" that are occurring, but it avoids words like "we" and "they." But we want all kids to be successful, whether they are in the U.S., India, China or somewhere else. We believe these ideas and conversations should be occurring globally, and we hope this helps contribute to that conversation.

Second, one of the (many) weaknesses of the original is that it didn’t ask anything of the viewers, or direct them to any resources. (In my own defense, that’s because it was just for my staff and I was doing the follow-up. As I’ve talked about previously, I had no idea that it would spread like it did . . .). This new version asks some questions at the end and directs folks to a wiki with some additional information (the wiki is still a work in progress, but we'll get there eventually). The wiki is not intended as a "one-stop" resource, just a fairly simple jumping off point for folks that would like more information. Hopefully they will be drawn into the conversations that we all have been a part of over the last few years. (I wanted to ask even more questions – I may blog those eventually – but it would’ve made the presentation way too long – at over 8 minutes, it’s already pushing it).

If you find it useful, please use it however you’d like (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share-Alike license). The YouTube version is embedded below, there's a Google Video version, and you can download a high-quality version in several different formats (just enter your name at the prompt) as well.



Thank you to XPLANE for some truly excellent visuals and animations, and to Scott McLeod for all his work and support. Frankly, I’m a little tired of the presentation, but I still passionately believe that we need to reexamine formal education as it’s currently being experienced by our students and that we owe it to our children to do everything we can to improve. If the presentation draws even a few folks into asking questions and getting involved in the conversations either locally or globally, then I’ll consider it a success.

Saturday, June 16, 2007

Blogging: In Their Own Words

At the end of the school year we were asked to try to get a video together about blogging to show at a conference for administrators in our state. The idea was that we were going to introduce them to live blogging and then actually have some folks in the audience live blog the keynote, with the keynote speaker being occasionally fed questions/thoughts/ideas from the blog. The details were a little fuzzy but, nice guys that we are, we scrambled to try to get something together.

So, about two days before finals, we hurriedly videotaped some students and teachers talking about blogging and then tried to figure out when we'd have time to put this together before June 13th (the first day of the conference), not to mention how to setup the live blogging, make sure they had enough info for it to work smoothly, get the wireless working, etc.

As it turns out, they decided to not go with this idea, which I think was a good thing given the compressed timeline - I think there's a good chance it would've been a disaster. They are considering doing it again for their next conference in August, which would be cool since the keynote speaker is supposed to be Daniel Pink, although I still worry about all the setup issues.

In any event, we had all this footage sitting around and I wanted to do something with it. I spent a little time editing and came up with the following. Please keep in mind a few things. As I mentioned, we hurriedly filmed about two days before finals, so we were only able to grab kids from a couple of classes and a few teachers that were available. So we don't have as wide of a selection of folks as I would like, and the quality of some of the video/audio isn't the best. (We had a wireless lapel microphone, but it didn't always work - meaning a good portion of the audio was just from the built-in camcorder microphone. You may have to manually raise and lower the volume sometimes to hear.) Obviously, I decided to post it anyway, so I guess it comes under the category of "good enough to criticize." I hope that - despite some of its shortcomings - some of you might find it useful.

Also, keep in mind that we've only been blogging for about a year and a half in my school, and many folks really only in the past six months or so, so we're still learning. We're pretty much still in the stage of moving and extending traditional classroom activities online, which I think can add value and enhance the learning when done well, but our next step is really to help our students develop their own personal learning networks through blogs and various other Web 2.0 tools. I hope that we will make some progress with that next school year.

I'm posting two versions, the long version, which is 15:30 (I have a hard time cutting students when they say such thoughtful things), and a shorter version (where I slashed - it was painful for me). I'm embedding the Google Video versions below, but you can also download Quicktime versions of both of them (320 by 240).

Long Version (Quicktime, 15:30, 67.3 MB)
Short Version (Quicktime, 8:16, 38.1 MB)

Part of the video talks about the fishbowl discussion technique (no relation to me!) used in conjunction with live blogging, you can learn more at these posts (1, 2 and 3).

Google Video Long Version (15:30)




Google Video Short Version (8:16)


Presenting at TIE and NECC

We'll be presenting at both TIE (Copper Mountain, Colorado, Wed 6/20/07, 1:00-3:00, Wheeler A, Copper Station) and NECC (Atlanta, Georgia, Tuesday, 6/26/07, 3:30–4:30, GWCC B208, blog tag: n07s647) in the next few weeks. The presentations are pretty much the same to begin with, but I think they'll end up being different due to the different audiences and the different structures of the sessions.

At TIE, we'll have two hours and everyone will have a computer in front of them. That means they can explore some of our examples on their own - and also that they can explore other things if we aren't engaging enough. The two hours will also allow us more time for conversation and it will likely be a fairly small audience (could be as many as 50, but probably 15-20). TIE also attracts a wide range of attendees, from veteran ed tech folks in Colorado to never-attended-an-ed-tech-conference-but-really-want-to-learn folks.

At NECC, we'll only have one hour and only those folks that bring their own laptops will have a computer in front of them. We really hope to create a conversation, but with that limited amount of time - and with possibly a much bigger audience (the room is big, but who knows how many will attend) - that's much harder. And I would guess that - overall - the NECC audience is more experienced than the TIE audience (but I could be wrong about that).

If anyone is planning on coming to either one, we have a quick blog set up for each session (blog for TIE session, blog for NECC session) where you can see the links to our examples (note that we will not be "covering" all of this, just there for reference later) and also a post where you can submit questions to us ahead of time. After the session there will then be another post up for feedback on the session and/or additional questions.

It will be interesting to see how they go - and how many people come to each session. It might turn out that it's easy to have a conversation because it might just be the five of us who are presenting in the room. At TIE we're opposite one of Will's sessions (as well as many other interesting looking sessions). And at NECC we're opposite a plethora of great sessions. Hmm, is it considered bad form to sneak out of your own session in order to go to someone else's?

Friday, June 15, 2007

Freshmen Projects

A couple of our teachers just posted some end-of-semester projects over on Learning and Laptops. Brad posted a couple of projects on the topic of the Cold War, including one that made excellent use of PowerPoint.

Anne then posted nine projects examining the question: What does literature say about us as human beings? She likes them all, but particularly recommends "Experiences."

As always, constructive criticism is welcome (on the particular blog post, please). Since I usually get asked, these are freshmen students (that's 14 or 15 years old for those of you outside of the U.S.).

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

What Free Software Should We Install?

As usual my school will be getting some new computers over the summer. Not as many as last year’s grant-fueled frenzy (over 250), but still quite a few (current count 128). Last summer I added some free software to my images and that appears to have worked well, so I’m going to do that again this summer.

It occurred to me that perhaps I could get advice from the edublogosphere about what free software you might recommend. My district went all Dell about five years ago, but I will be getting a few Macs as well (it’s a long story, but just so everyone in my district is clear on this, the district standards have not changed). Since I added some free Windows-based software last summer, I have a head start on that list, but would love additional suggestions (or warnings for that matter). And I could really use advice on the Mac side since my knowledge there is pretty rusty (since the last time I was really knowledgeable of Mac software in terms of what a school would use, OS 9 was still the OS of choice).

Here are the specs:

Windows Desktop: Dell Optiplex 740, AMD 64x2 4200+ chip (2.2 Ghz, dual-core), 1 GB RAM, 80 GB 7200 rpm hard drive, DVD+-RW optical drive, integrated NVIDIA Quatro NVS 210S Graphics, 17-inch flat panel monitor. Running Windows XP SP2.

Windows Laptop: Dell Latitude D630, 1.8 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo (T7100) chip, 1 GB RAM, 60 GB hard drive, Intel integrated graphics, 24x DVD Combo drive, Dell Wireless (a/g), 9-cell primary, 6-cell modular battery (replaces optical drive), 14.1 inch screen. Running Windows XP SP2.

Apple Desktop: 17-inch iMac (hoping Apple releases next generation of iMac by July 1st, but these are the specs at the moment), 2.0 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo chip, 1 GB RAM, 160 GB hard drive, DVD+-RW optical drive, ATI Radion X1600 graphics (128 MB SDRAM), and 17-inch widescreen display. Running OS X 10.4 (Tiger).

Here’s the software:

Windows Software
Owned by district/school: Windows XP SP2, Office 2003, Geometer’s Sketchpad, Fathom, Logger Pro, Microtype Pro, Symantec Anti-Virus, Adobe Creative Suite 3 (Indesign, Photoshop, Illustrator, Acrobat Professional), whatever version of Roxio that ships with the optical drives, things that ship with Windows XP (Movie Maker, Media Player, etc.)
Free, downloadable, plugins, etc.: Firefox, Realplayer, Flash, Shockwave, Quicktime, iTunes, JAVA, PowerCalc (MS), Photo Story 3 (MS), Google Earth, Picassa, Audacity, CMAP, Nvu, Celestia, Wink, Skype (depending on location of computer).

Apple Software
Owned by district/school: OS X 10.4 (Tiger), Office 2004, Geometer’s Sketchpad, Fathom, Logger Pro, Symantec Anti-Virus, Adobe Creative Suite 3 (Indesign, Photoshop, Illustrator, Acrobat Professional), things that ship with OS X (iLife: iTunes, iPhoto, iMovie, iDVD, Garageband; Quicktime, etc.).
Free, downloadable, plugins, etc.: Firefox, Realplayer, Flash, Shockwave, Windows Media Player, Google Earth, CMAP, Nvu, Celestia.
So, I’d appreciate it if you’d leave a comment if you have something to add to that list, or if you have a comment on the existing list of software.

Sunday, June 03, 2007

21st Century Business Panel

The teachers in my staff development had the opportunity to participate in a conversation with eight leaders from the business world last Thursday. Throughout our discussions over the last few years, one of our worries has been whether some of the changes we have been talking about might actually do a disservice to our students (either short term or long term) in terms of them being successful at the college level or in the world of work. In other words, what if we’re really, really wrong?

Now, before I go on, let me state clearly that I don’t believe that all we are about in education is preparing future employees. I want our students to be successful human beings – successful in their personal lives, successful in their work, successful citizens in the 21st century. To be both personally and professionally productive, to be a contributor to their communities and the world, and – yes – to be happy. But I do certainly think that part of that is helping prepare them to be successful in the world of work, so we thought having a conversation with some folks from the business world – getting their perspective on some of the ideas we’ve been talking about – would be very valuable.

As fate would have it, Kelly Dignan is an entrepreneur who was doing some volunteer work through Junior Achievement in one of our Business classes. She also stumbled across The Fischbowl and realized that I was talking about the school she was volunteering in. She wrote a nice email about the blog and then made the mistake of closing with "If there’s ever anything I can do for you . . ." I wrote back and pitched the idea of getting some of her colleagues/contacts together to speak with the teachers in our staff development about what they felt students needed to be successful in the 21st century. She thought it was a great idea and ran with it.

In addition to forty-four or so of the teachers in our staff development, we had our district Director of Career and Technical Education, our district CIO, our Superintendent, and four of our five school board members. (Umm, yeah, I was a little nervous.) Now, it turns out Kelly knows a lot of folks in a variety of industries, and she assembled the following panel for us:

Pete Dignan – President of ProtoTest.

Carla Donelson – Former Vice President & General Counsel of Verio.

Vicki Scharnhorst - Chief Operating Officer of MWH Federal Services.

Karyn German – VP of Product Development and Support at NewsGator. (Karyn couldn’t make it, but submitted written responses.)

De McQueenColorado Business Bank.

Chris Onan - Managing Director with Appian Ventures.

Nancy Sauer – President of D2Xchange.

Chris Scherpenseel – Former President and GM, FRx Software Corporation.

Moderator: Kelly Dignan – Director of Pursue U.

We then provided the panel with some hastily composed guiding questions that they could be thinking about before they came.
  1. What skills/abilities do you feel students need to have to be successful in the 21st century as employees?

  2. What skills/abilities do students need to have to be successful citizens in a globally-interconnected world?

  3. Looking at the students you currently see entering the workforce, what are their strengths and what are their weaknesses?

  4. There is a lot of discussion in K-12 education about the importance of content knowledge (knowing a lot of “stuff” about math, science, social studies, language arts, etc.) versus the importance of learning skills and students being able to construct their own understanding of material/ideas that are new to them (being able to “learn how to learn”). What are your thoughts regarding how much we should focus on content knowledge versus focusing on students’ ability to learn/adapt/grow?

  5. There is also a lot of discussion in education on the tension between being successful as an individual and being successful as part of a group or team. We’d like to hear more about your thoughts regarding this.

  6. Tell us a little bit about any changes you foresee for the workplace in the next 5-15 years (and beyond). What do you think this means for students currently in high school and for K-12 education in general?

  7. What types of technologies should our students be proficient at using?

  8. What was the best learning/educational experience you have had? Why?

  9. If you were going to design a 21st century high school from the ground up, what are three key features you would include? These features could be physical (building features), pedagogical (teaching techniques/approach), structural (curriculum, schedule, etc.), technological (specific tools/software/experiences), etc.

  10. When we're done today, what's the one most important "take-away" message you'd like our teachers to hear?
While we knew we wouldn’t be able to get through all these questions in two hours, we wanted to give them an idea of the questions we were wondering about. As it turned out, we probably only talked about three or four of the questions, but that was because the conversation was so good. They started out talking, we asked some follow-up/clarifying questions, and they asked us some questions back. In other words, it turned into a conversation instead of a presentation (well, with 60 or so people it wasn’t quite a conversation, but it was still pretty good give and take). Here are some of the highlights (these are not direct quotes, but close - from my notes):
  • A core value is to learn something from every situation.

  • People must have a willingness to learn new ways of doing things, to study best practices, and to evolve their thinking – not to think that the way they’ve always done things is the only or best way.

  • Both written and verbal communication skills are essential for everyone.

  • Teamwork and collaboration are key. Everyone needs to be able to take a leadership role at the appropriate times, as well as be a contributor at the appropriate times.

  • Acceptance of differences/diversity is important. Everything is global and folks need to work hard to understand different countries and cultures – as well as the cultures of other companies. Norms are very important.

  • They need to have the ability to make a plan with very little guidance – there’s not a rubric for everything. They need to take the initiative and be producers.

  • There is no one right answer – there are lots of answers, some are better than others – and critical thinking skills are paramount.

  • Creative thinking and flexibility is key – they need to be problem solvers, not just memorizers and regurgitators.

  • Having said that, a strong foundation in the basics is still necessary - but it’s necessary, not sufficient, to be successful in the 21st century. We need to ask them to do more – not more of the same, but more meaningful, purposeful, productive work.

  • They need to de-center. They need to lose the sense of entitlement - “Ask not what your employer can do for you . . .” Also, community service is key. Understanding and taking an active role in helping others.

  • All students should have a minor in leadership.

  • All students should have lots of experience working in small groups to solve meaningful problems. They shouldn’t focus on the final answer, but how you get there. An inquiry approach, with students always looking ahead one step. Don’t just think about the current step as you’re making a decision, but what’s going to be next when you solve this problem. As you’re working on anything, come up with the next set of questions.

  • Listening is essential.

  • They need an awareness that they are part of a global economy – work can be done anywhere, ideas flow freely around the world instantly. Work will move to where it will be done most efficiently, and being able to use technology effectively is a big part of that.

  • Technology and the Internet are everywhere – they should be everywhere for students.

  • Students need to find their passion and learn all they can about it.

  • Cross-training is also important – understanding all the roles in a company/organization/problem so that they have the big picture.

  • Healthy competition is important, we all have to compete with companies around the world. But collaboration is more important, we need to work as a team within our company. They need to move from “I” to “we.” Everything is done as part of a team, both within a company and across companies working together on a particular project. Those that are only successful as individuals are not successful in any of their companies. [A follow-up question was – where can those individual folks be successful? Answer: Sales.]

  • Students need more self-knowledge, to be reflective, and to know their own strengths and weaknesses. They should play to their strengths. Yes, they should try to overcome their weaknesses, but they should really leverage their strengths, find their passion.

  • Parents have a responsibility to teach their kids respect and expose their children to lots of different and varied experiences – we need to pressure them to step up. [As you might imagine, the teachers agreed with this one. While I don’t disagree, the fact remains that we still need to meet the needs of the students we have – whether their parents have “stepped up” or not.]

  • We need to focus on life skills for students, on creating an environment where students can do their best work. Students need to learn by doing – applied learning, internships.

  • There’s a world of ideas out there – you need to pursue them with passion.
I'm sure there were things I missed, but this is most of what I wrote down. While none of this was earth shattering or particularly surprising, it was good to hear that what they thought was necessary for our students to be successful in the 21st century pretty much matched up to what we think – and have been working on. The panelists were all very passionate not only about what they do, but about education and giving back. It was good to see how much they cared about education, and how much they appreciated our efforts.

Overall, it was a very worthwhile two hours. I, of course, would’ve loved for it to continue for about another five, but we did have small group and then large group discussion among our teachers afterward. They all found it informative and engaging, and the feedback from the panelists (and the school board members) was very positive as well. We will now be thinking about ways to bring some or all of these folks back again, to have further conversations with our teachers and hopefully to come into some classrooms and have conversations with our students as well. Ultimately, they are the ones that need to hear this the most.