<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener("load", function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <iframe src="http://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID=16660456&amp;blogName=The+Fischbowl&amp;publishMode=PUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT&amp;navbarType=BLUE&amp;layoutType=CLASSIC&amp;searchRoot=http%3A%2F%2Fthefischbowl.blogspot.com%2Fsearch&amp;blogLocale=en_US&amp;homepageUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fthefischbowl.blogspot.com%2F" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" height="30px" width="100%" id="navbar-iframe" allowtransparency="true" title="Blogger Navigation and Search"></iframe> <div></div>

Monday, November 27, 2006

2020 Vision

Update 4-14-07: For more thoughts about this, read 2020 Vision on DesignShare

This post - and resulting presentation - has been kicking around in my head for the last month or two. One of the difficulties I've encountered with our staff development efforts is being unable to define a specific vision for what the future is going to look like. While I have many ideas about the changes that are occurring - and are going to occur - and the general direction we should head, I can't nail down specifically what school - or the world - is going to look like 5 or 10 or 15 years out. The pace of change is so great that it's nearly impossible to predict what's going to happen. And, for teachers that are used to the seemingly endless pendulum swings in education, that makes them hesitant to commit.

So what I wanted to create was some kind of plausible "vision" of the future that they could ponder and discuss. As I write this, I realize that I've created a trilogy of sorts. The "What If" presentation was a look at the past, at the resistance to change in education. The "Did You Know" presentation was mainly a look at our present, at the incredible changes that are happening due to "flat world" factors and technological change (with a dash of prediction thrown in). And now "2020 Vision" is a look "back" at our future from the year 2020. (Ummm, yeah, sure, I planned to create a trilogy. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.) Maybe by having one possible version of the future to consider we can get past the natural resistance to change. If nothing else, I hope it's another example of David Warlick's "telling the new story" to get those conversations started.

I've thought about this for a couple of months because I never felt like I had all the pieces of the story to create a really good "future." I still don't, but I decided I was never going to have enough time - or enough creativity - to get exactly what I wanted, and I didn't want to wait any longer because I think this conversation needs to take place now. (Plus, things kept happening - like Google buying YouTube - so I kept having to come up with new ideas!) So, the presentation includes some "predictions" about technology, and some "predictions" about changes in my school, as I speak at the graduation for the class of 2020 (hey, it's my future, I can pretend can't I?) - who will be starting Kindergarten next fall. But let me be clear that I am not predicting that these things will actually occur. While I think they are generally plausible, things are changing so quickly that it's next to impossible (for me, anyway) to predict with any kind of accuracy. And I think this is a case of where the truth will end up being stranger than fiction. Let me also be clear that this "future" is not necessarily what I would like to see happen, although there are pieces of it that I would certainly be in favor of. The goal is not to debate the plausibility of any specific predictions, but to envision a time in the not-too-distant future when the world is significantly different - and hopefully schools are as well. Then, based on what that could look like, what should we be doing now to help prepare for and transition to that future. Hopefully this "2020 Vision" will help get those conversations started.

This is intended for my staff development efforts but, of course, anyone is welcome to use it (or, better yet, create your own). While I don't have any sources for this (since it's made up), there were lots of influences. The three most prominent ones would be the EPIC video , Will Richardson's Morning at RSS-Blog-Furl High School Redux post as well as his book , and Ray Kurzweil's book.

Download 2020 Vision (Windows Media Player format - 17 MB) - the volume kicks in on the third slide.

Download 2020 Vision (Quicktime format - 97 MB).

Be forewarned, it's a little long, but that's a small price to pay to see the future . . .

Update 11-28-06: I had a request to post this to Google Video, so I did. That also allows me to embed it in this post. This is the first time I've tried this, so we'll see how it goes.

This appears to work sometimes, but not others. I'm still trying to figure out why.


Update 11-29-06: I added a Quicktime version since someone pointed out that the Windows Media Player version requires codecs that are only available on the Windows platform (although I believe the Google Video version embedded above - which is in Flash - should work on most platforms). Sorry about that.

Update 6-21-08: Here's the script I used (Word, PDF). No guarantees that I stuck to it exactly, but it should be close.

Add this post to Del.icio.us

25 Comments:

Blogger Mr. H said...

Everytime my bloglines account says that you have created a post it is the first read I scan to. You are so insightful and interesting to read. You are also the king of the movie. This is a great piece of work and it reafirms those of us who struggle to show the importance of 2.0. I wish you continued success with your dreams continue to inspire your audience.

Thanks

Chris Harbeck
Sargent Park School
Winipeg Manitoba Canada
makeitinteresting.blogspot.com
sargentparkmathzone.blogspot.com

11/28/06 7:13 AM  
Blogger Will said...

Great job, Karl. The video offers a great deal to think about. Hopefully, we'll look back on this vision and nod our heads. "See that, Karl was right!" And, I hate you for that "2020 Vision" concept. Just too perfect. Thanks for your great work.
Best,

Will

11/28/06 7:41 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Karl:

Great job.... I will be showing this to our staff over the next few days as we start dealing with some of the professional development programs we need to implement.

I am also one of the "Google Certified Teachers" that was trained earlier this month and I will be posting a link to your video as soon as I finish writing this comment.

11/28/06 1:43 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Structurally, socio-economically, connectivity will be the order of the day. Now, what will be the essential learnings for such an inter-connected world? If, indeed, technology brings us closer globally, what will we need to be proficient in?

I'm somewhat transfixed by the idea that our educational schemas might have to shift even further towards ethical problem-solving in that critical thinking might have to be revised so that it takes into account the dilemmas that we cause others and the natural world as a result of this "spider web" of connectivity.

11/28/06 2:14 PM  
Blogger Dean Shareski said...

Thanks for all your good work. I definitely see your idea going far.

11/28/06 3:10 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Karl -- Better late to the Fischbowl party than never arriving at all. How I've missed out on the quality of your work, provocations, ideas is beyond me...but today's a whole new day in the edu-blogosphere...and I'm quite pleased.

I'm leading a back-to-back presentation next week in Austin, TX with school design professionals and educational leaders. The focus of the talk is to look at "dig:nats" and emerging tech (social networking, et al) trends as a future-think backdrop to designing educational facilities that will engage learning in the future.

I had previously thought of using Epic 2014 but thought it too out-there for the purpose of this audience's goals, but when I watched 2020 Vision I knew that I MUST show it to this audience to set the tone for all that we'll do over the next 4+ hours.

Your final statement about kids still coming to school (buildings) and campus for engagement and collaboration will be a great capper. What I need to do after that is figure out a way to help the audience wrestle with how to deal with today's brick-n-mortar/seat needs with tomorrow's rapid evolution of what learning.

As my organization, DesignShare, says, it's about "Designing for the Future of Leanring." And what you did will be a powerful agent for our national and global audience.

I'll also be sharing it with colleagues in Germany and Holland during separate speaking tours in Jan and Mar. Needless to say, I think it'll spark much dialogue on the other side of the Atlantic, too!

Again, thanks for your provocation. I'll definitely be heading to Feedblitz to get my Fishbowl RSS feed subscription set up pronto!

Cheers,
Christian

11/29/06 10:32 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ok, talk about the wonderful convergence of the web. I'm on a Vision committee on my campus who is looking at the future graduates, when I stumble across Will Richardson's post about your video.

Then as I am reading the comments, I see a post that DesignShare(who I just discovered last week) is going to be in Austin, where I live and work NEXT week! I'm working with architects on redesigning our library, and was so excited when I ran across your work.

So....thanks to Will, Thanks to Karl for your fascinating work, and I'm hoping I can connect with Design Share!

I plan to post a link to your video for our vision committee to watch and discuss.

Thanks,
Carolyn Foote
Westlake HS
Austin, Tx
www.futura.edublogs.org
www.trends.edublogs.org

11/29/06 7:02 PM  
Blogger BenH said...

That was awesome. The predictions seem good, and it was really interesting where you went. I agree with Will. Hopefully we will look back and say that you were right.

I think the video made me like school less. Why are we doing this? Why not what was in that video?

Again, a great job. Really well done.

And even better than these predictions, you are working towards them now, trying to help the school with technology. To me, that is the coolest part.

11/29/06 7:27 PM  
Blogger JenW said...

That was truly the BEST 15 minutes and 45 seconds I have spent in a LONG Time and I thank you for your creativity and also your forward thinking.

I was amused and then also amazed at what you presented and wrote much of it down to remember to check to see if things really do happen in the next 13 years. (I am hoping that the Amazon E-Bay buyout is a for sure!)

There are a lot of things we all do with out time.....and I just wanted to say THANK YOU for taking your valuable time to put together something so vivid and usable and thought provoking for so many of us.

I am new to your blog -- but now I am a subscriber.

Thanks again -
Jennifer Wagner
www.technospud.com
http://onlineprojects4teachers.com/wordpress/

11/30/06 1:16 AM  
Blogger Jerry K said...

Karl, this was so thought provoking that I am struggling to decide how and where to begin to comment other than to say … WOW. The obvious is to state that I think we must read very different books and magazines. Perhaps I should change that fact. Secondly, how do you sleep at night with that kind of stuff running through your mind? As I mentioned in passing, I would like to get your views on the impact of a, seemingly, more sedentary life style / work style on physical health, obesity (a crisis in American youth today) and longevity. Along with this, the impact of these societal changes on an already strained health care system.
If, conservatively, only 10%-20% of your predictions are accurate then dramatic changes in the goals, structure and delivery of education must and will occur. I believe we can be catalysts for these changes or we can choose to be “reluctant passenger” on a train we have chosen to ride. I hope we collectively choose the catalyst role in LPS and specifically at AHS. Thanks for the mind expansion. JK

12/1/06 3:27 PM  
Blogger Spencer Z said...

Mr. Fisch,

I'm not certain if you remember me (we've talked very briefly once or twice), but my name is Spencer Zepelin, and I'm a sophomore at AHS.

After a glowing recommendation from Knafelc and having already seen and enjoyed your "Did you know?" video (esp. for the brilliant soundtrack) I determined myself to watch this, and I experienced a panorama of emotion. At once I was frightened; this vision of the not so distant future seemed foreign and unfamiliar. Yet, at the same time, this fear excited me, much as one feels excited when they reach the top of a roller coaster and anticipate the drop. Our world today seems to be this roller coaster, and we seem to be fast approaching the plunge. I would love to have the opportunity to discuss this with you at some point since many questions are currently flooding through my mind. One of my main concerns, not unlike those of Mr. Knafelc, is the loss of the human element in both school and society. Even today the older generation complains that "times aren't like they used to be, no one just sits and talks anymore." This may be hackneyed, but today this is becoming an increasingly valid and perhaps worrisome point. At the same time, your ideas would no doubt give way to increased youth voice and consequently youth rights (something I feel will be a large movement in the near future). Relating to your "stranger than fiction" comment, I remember reading in Ender's game years back that Ender's brother and sister were publishing online (not unlike blogging) and, even as children, became major, and ironically, opposing political voices. After watching your presentation I feel that this is within the realm of possibility. In addition, you seem remarkably optimistic about google's future, but what if they fail to stick to their adage "Don't be evil"?

I would love to spend some time discussing this with you if you have an off-hour sometime or if you wouldn't mind spending some time after school.

Though I know this is a tangent, I recently realized that you and Will Smith have a remarkable connection. If I'm not mistaken, both you and he had full ride scholarships to MIT! Pretty sweet right?

Anyway, I hope to hear back from you soon. My e-mail is:
zepelinator@gmail.com
Kind of ironic that it's google, isn't it?

Until then, thanks Karl "Fresh Prince" Fisch! I'll talk to you soon!

Yours,
Spencer "Danger" Zepelin

12/1/06 7:00 PM  
Blogger HUH? said...

I am truly awed in all of your works Mr. Fisch. My world seems to shift everytime I encounter your predictions.

My name is Dan Huh and I am currently a sophomore enrolled at Arapahoe High School. The world cannot stop spinning and technology must persist to accommodate for the ever so needy world. I can remember back in my late kindergarten days when my dad bought our first IBM computer that ran on windows 95. The megabyte was all very complex and the gigabyte was fairly new. Today, hand-held computers run significantly faster than block computers eleven years ago. After listening to your presentation, I absolutely agree that it is important to address our current technological state and prepare to face the next generation's wave of change. This generation of high school students may very well have to maintain the growth and stability of the technology predicted in "2020 Vision." We must all be technology wary, ready to take on the adventure. Like Spencer said, "Our world today seems to be this roller coaster, and we seem to be fast approaching the plunge."

Thank you for creating the spark to open the vision for future technological innovations.

Keep it up Mr. Fisch,
Dan Huh

12/2/06 12:01 AM  
Blogger Jerry K said...

This post has been removed by a blog administrator.

12/2/06 4:17 PM  
Blogger Jerry K said...

This post has been removed by a blog administrator.

12/2/06 4:18 PM  
Blogger Karl Fisch said...

Spencer,

Well, I don't know about Will Smith, but I - and my parents - only wish I had a full ride. I did get some scholarship money, but it was well short of a "full" ride. I'm only hoping that my fellow teachers don't read your comment or I'll have a new nickname.

You're welcome to drop by and talk anytime, although don't expect too much wisdom. I'm mostly good at asking questions. As far as losing the human element, I think that is a valid concern, but somehow I'm not that worried about it. Up to this point technology has - for the most part - enhanced and expanded human communication, and I expect it to continue to do so. While us "older" folks tend to frown at IM and texting and MySpace, aren't they just another form of communication? Yes, they can be used inappropriately, but that's true about just about everything humans have invented. When I was young (ummm, younger), the older generation complained about the telephone. They viewed it as impersonal and only to be used for certain formal functions. While I agree that it's different than face to face communication, I would argue that most folks today don't feel like the telephone should only be used for certain formal functions. It shouldn't be used for everything, but I feel like I've had very meaningful human communication via the telephone. I think all these possible new technologies will continue to enhance that communication (when used appropriately). I think it will not only give a voice to the young, but also to many others that typically have not had a voice. And I think that's a very good thing.

I think my presentation did have a little too much Google in it but, as I said in the post, I just decided I was never going to get the presentation quite how I wanted it, so I went with it as is. Part of the point of the presentation - much like the EPIC video I referenced - was to sound a small cautionary note about these or similar events. I think there's a possibility that Google will assume Microsoft's role as the not-very-well-liked and somewhat feared company that maybe knows a little too much about us. It's something to pay attention to over the next few years, but I'm cautiously optimistic that Google will manage to avoid becoming evil.

As far as Ender's Game goes, I think we are seeing many of those ideas come to fruition today (minus the alien invasion). So, would you rather I be Demosthenes and you be Locke, or vice versa?

12/2/06 6:15 PM  
Blogger Cara S. said...

I watched 2020 Vision about a week ago, but like Jerry, felt the need to process everything that was presented before adding a response.

Let me start with a message to Spencer...as your former Biology teacher, I don't think you have to be concerned about anyone remembering you! What great comments...thought- provoking and well written.

Like Spencer, I experienced a wave of emotions as I watched this presentation. There was definitely a bit of fear mixed in, especially after reading Ben H's comment that "the video made me like school less. Why are we doing this?" I can only guess that other teachers might worry about the same thing. If this really is a possibility for the future, where does that leave the teacher? We become less and less important as technology can provide the same things we do now in a faster, broader, and flashier way.

But, I was struck by the idea that in spite of all of the changes taking place in the future, students still chose to come to school. For the human contact, the relationships, the social interaction.

So, I think the best way to alleviate our fears about the future is to start evaluating our role as the teacher right now. If the information is already out there, what is our job as the teacher? I think our focus needs to shift away from the distribution of information and towards helping students process information and do something meaningful with what they've learned.

In other words, we need to make our classrooms a place where students want to be. I think we've made small steps in this direction and I think we need to keep reminding ourselves that it's important. Because creating an learning environment that students choose and enjoy isn't scary, it's downright cool.

12/5/06 2:44 PM  
Blogger Tracy Fowler said...

Karl, your video is wonderful! Of course those of us who've watched technology for the past 10+ years know that whatever we dream of now won't come close to what will actually happen! The rate of change is too rapid and too dynamic to begin to project out 13 years.

I'm utterly convinced that what we'll see in technology by 2020 will blow away your scenario. However, I'm frightened that schools will look the same as they do today, and that kids will be even more disconnected from the educational system. There are so many forces that promote "more of the same", and too few who are willing to look at our roles as educators and and the need to redefine ourselves. Keep up your good work as a force for positive change!

12/19/06 4:56 PM  
Blogger Ama F. Shabazz said...

In his blog of Monday, Nov. 27, 2006, entitled, "2020 Vision", Karl Fisch wrote about the difficulties he has encountered with staff development efforts to "define a specific vision of what the future is going to look like", and the problems of "nailing down specifically what school – or the world will look like 5 or 10 or 15 years out." May I suggest a valuable resource for Karl Fisch and other teachers to consider for their staff development at Arapahoe High School in the district of Littleton Public Schools? The 2006-20016 Map of Future Forces Affecting Education, developed by the Institute for the Future and KnowledgeWorks Foundation, is available online as an interactive resource at: http://www.kwfdn.org/map . Based on expert opinion aggregation and ethnographic studies, the map is not a prediction, but it offers a plausible, internally consistent view of what might happen in the coming decade, based on prevailing trends. The forecast in the map raises key questions about education in this decade. If you consider the trends on the map that resonate with your group and imagine their implications, you will find that you can make better decisions in the present. The map is useful for planning for the future: from foresight, to insight, to action. Many education leaders who have used the map report that they have found it quite helpful for evoking useful discussions about the future. For group discussions, multiple hard copies of the map can be requested via the map website.

Ama Shabazz, M.A. Ed.
Program Officer –Education Strategy
KnowledgeWorks Foundation
One West Fourth Street, Suite 200
Cincinnati, OH 45202-3634
Telephone: 513-929-1342
Electronic Mail: Shabazza@kwfdn.org

2/23/07 8:07 AM  
Blogger Ryan Betts said...

Karl, great job! That was fun, you gave something to think about. I hope we see a restructuring of our education system, the opening of classrooms, and the development of collaborative learning communities.
Thanks for sharing your positive vision, now we can all focus our energies on making that vision materialize. I think I may go buy some google stock today!
Regards,

Ryan
Teachers Using Technology
www.teachersusingtechnology.com

2/24/07 9:31 AM  
Blogger John Mullinax said...

Nice post. Your struggle to create a vision and strategy in an environment of accelerating change is one we all share... though we don't always recongize it! :-) I don't have any silver bullets, but thought the concept of scenario planning might be useful for you.

Basically, scenario planning is a structured methodology to help you think about uncertain futures. Start by thinking about the 2 things that are most important and simultaneously most uncertain about the future. Create a continuum for each of these important and uncertain topics, and then plot them against each other to create four quadrants. For each of these quadrants, create a vision of what the future might look like that reflect the quadrant in terms of the two important and uncertain topics. Some of these stories will be happier, and some will be sadder -- but they should all be plausible (after all, they were chosen precisely because they were important and could not be "ruled out").

The key insight is to then craft a strategy that will help you be successful in any of the four versions of the future you've envisioned! This frees the mind from the burden of having to correctly predict the future.

One other thought: you may want to check out the Santa Fe Institute. It's a think tank focused on complexity science. There's a working paper there from 2004 that might be be helpful. It describes the case where even in the unlikely event you have enough understanding of your system to fully predict the intended and unintended consequences of actions, you still can't predict consquences because the system itself is changing to rapidly. The paper is a bit long and dense, but I've summarized the paper and tie-ins to scenario planning here: http://blogs.msdn.com/johnmullinax/archive/2006/11/27/ontological-uncertainty-and-innovation.aspx.

5/8/07 4:38 PM  
Blogger marconipp said...

Nice post, nice vision.
Do you have the transcript of this video?

If you have, please, post a link that we can download. It would be easier to translate do other languages.

Thanks in advance,
Marconi (from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil)

6/18/08 2:52 PM  
Blogger Karl Fisch said...

@marconipp - Transcript in Word and transcript in PDF format.

No guarantee that I stuck to the script exactly, but it should be close.

6/21/08 3:23 PM  
Blogger Robby! said...

You said: "President Obama"... back in 2006???!!!
Well, that should add tons of credibility to your projections!
I just attended Shift Happens and 2020 Vision today. They are great. Congratulations.

1/29/09 5:50 PM  
Blogger Karl Fisch said...

@Robby! - Thanks. Although, for the record, I didn't have him being President until 2018 or so. As I said in another post, the truth was much weirder than the fiction!

1/29/09 6:18 PM  
OpenID andrewbwatt said...

I found this post, and linked back to the original. I'm interested in the technology aspects of using Keynote, PowerPoint, and other software, and this "180-day?" show seemed like an easy one to make.

Easy to make.

Not so easy to view. I think that it was an eye-opener for me. I wonder how the rest of my school will consider it, and what they will find admirable, unavoidable, or a crying shame...?

Here's the link... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HAZtM9PuQ0

5/24/09 6:19 PM  

Post a Comment

Tuesday, November 21, 2006

Flat World Update

Just a quick post for your consideration.

This video mentions an interesting fact:
Last year more students in China took the SAT in English than did so in the United States.
And this video demonstrates a prototype of real-time language translation - you speak, it transcribes, then translates, then reads the translation. Within the next 10 years this will be fully functional and built into your cell phone.

Even though in some respects these almost contradict each other, I think the underlying message is the same - the playing field is getting more and more level every day.

Add this post to Del.icio.us

2 Comments:

Blogger James H said...

This is some amazing information and it gives me a better idea of how close to the flat world that we are living in. I would have expected the number of students to surpass the US sometime in the near future but not currently. I also think that the way technology in advancing that the translator is closer than they are predicting. Regardless, that opens up more communication to everyone in the world.

11/21/06 2:45 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm becoming a regular reader of your blog, need to make the time to do more of the same.

I did not see any reference to http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/ in your blog, and felt that it was relevant to this and other topics of yours. Just sharing!

11/27/06 12:27 PM  

Post a Comment

Saturday, November 11, 2006

Trust But Verify

In our Cohort 2 staff development session on Thursday we had some very interesting conversations. I thought one discussion in particular was very helpful to me, when in the morning session we discussed the relative merits of allowing students to have more control over what they learn versus making sure they are exposed to a variety of ideas. I think most of us would agree that allowing students to have more of a say in what they learn is empowering, and is more likely to engage them and therefore they are then more likely to be successful learners. I also think that most of us would agree that our students need exposure to lots of different ideas, even topics that don't necessarily appeal to them, at least not initially. That they need to engage the world of ideas around them, not just the specific areas that interest them, and that our passion as teachers can help facilitate their engagement in areas we deem valuable. As with just about everything we discuss, I think there is a balance to be had, it's just somewhat tricky to figure out where that balance is.

There was one point that was raised that I've been thinking about a lot since the discussion. When talking about giving students more choice the issue was raised that students would often (or possibly always) choose whatever choice they perceived to be easier. I'm not sure if I disagreed at the time or not, but I don't think I do agree with this. I think that to the extent this is true, it's because we've trained them to do this. Since very early on in their school careers, we've drilled into them how important grades are. By the time they get to high school, my fear - as we've discussed previously - is that they begin to believe that grades are the goal. That learning becomes subservient to, and sometimes completely overwhelmed by, grades. Therefore, if getting a good grade is so all important, then isn't choosing the easier assignment the logical choice? Instead of condemning them for it, shouldn't we be rejoicing that they've learned their lessons well?

I believe that if we can remove the emphasis on grades and refocus on learning, students more often than not will choose the most interesting and personally relevant assignment, not necessarily the easiest. I know this may be somewhat naive (or possibly "hopelessly naive") on my part, but I think we need to start trusting our students more. I think they are more than capable of making good choices for themselves and - when they do not - that it's our role as teachers to help them make a better choice in the future. That our role needs to be less about making choices and decisions for them, and more about helping them become good decision makers for themselves. Isn't one of our goals that when they leave high school, they are well prepared to move into the "adult" world? If so, shouldn't we give them some practice in making those decisions in the relative safety of high school? After all, that's one of the main arguments we give for our variable schedule, so why do we seem to shy away from it in our classrooms? (As a side note, maybe if we do this a lot fewer of them will move back in with Mom and Dad for most of their 20's.)

As I've stated several times before, I think this is their education, not ours. If that's true - and if we want our students to really and truly believe that - then we are going to have to start trusting them. Yes, the level of trust and freedom will vary depending on age and individual maturity level, just like it already does (or should). And yes we still have the realities of curriculum and mandated testing. But I think that if we truly want them to be self-motivated, life-long, successful learners in the 21st century, we are going to have to give up some of the control and trust them to make more of their own decisions - with our guidance, of course. Trust - but verify. I fear that if we don't, if we insist on adhering to an industrial age schooling model, we risk losing all relevance whatsoever. And, given the learning choices that students are beginning to have in whatever we are going to call this current, post information age, I think we need to keep in mind that we no longer have a captive audience. We need to continue to give students reasons to choose to learn with us - or they will learn without us.

As usual, I'm thinking out loud here so I'd love to hear your thoughts on these ideas. Anything you can add that will help push my thinking along will be greatly appreciated.

Add this post to Del.icio.us

18 Comments:

Blogger Davis said...

I agree Karl. We do need to make a cognitive shift in our teaching deciding whether we want to do the learning, the students, or both of us. I will never forget an administrator asking me if I was completely exhausted at the end of the day. I was confused and asked why. She responded that I seemed to be racing around, answering questions, showing examples, entertaining students--essentially the one-man band in 2nd hour English. It was true. I needed to shift the responsibility of learning to my students.

Here's my conundrum, though. My seniors embrace it. They understand that their independence is a short 9 months away and they take the lessons, the assignments serious and really stretch to learn. I have many assignments I don't even grade. I have not had one student question my practices. At this level it works.

With my 9th graders, however. Their immaturity is getting in the way. They do choose the easy road, screw around in class and want to be entertained 24/7...and, if they're not, they'll do it for me! How nice. Jessie and I have stated this frustration and do wonder about maturity level. On days that we studied inductive thinking, they were engaged. When I read to them, modeling reading strategies, and enlicit questions from them, they also seem eager to learn. But, when they are to work independently, work in small groups, or without a tight leash on them, chaos is immediate.

I am interested to see what others say and would like to research constructivism and developmental readiness.

11/12/06 8:44 PM  
Blogger bkitch said...

I agree with both of you. I also struggle with the question of the students' foundations. I find that often regardless of age, students who have a strong foundation of a subject matter have the ability to climb that critical thinking ladder and I can use more constuctivist methods. On the contrary, student who have little to no foundation in a subject seem to have a lot more problems connecting the learning and creating their own thoughts, theories and understanding. Any thoughts on this also?

11/13/06 12:15 PM  
Blogger Missy Jonson said...

I agree as well. With math it is very difficult to explore the deeper ocean when some students can't do their basic skills to get them to that deeper level of thinking. I would also be curious to research how other countries (that are more successful with deeper understanding with their students) approach the different teaching styles.

11/13/06 1:15 PM  
Blogger mferrill said...

In a perfect world, grades would not exist. Teachers would inspire and motivate students to learn for the sake of learning. Once students mastered specific skills, they could begin practice on another skill set and discover more new ideas to explore. Proof of student learning and mastery would be kept in a portfolio that could replace traditional carnegie units needed for a high school diploma, and everyone would live happily ever after.

Alas, the perfect world does not exist even though several of us tried to create it ten years ago under the name of Direction 2000. That program ended because the community demanded accountability in assessing student performance, and portfolios were not standard products.

I think most teachers agree that traditional grades are not the best way to promote student learning, but until we can convince the public to agree with our understanding of how students learn, we are spinning our wheels.

11/13/06 3:38 PM  
Blogger Karl Fisch said...

So, Marlys, does this mean that if we could convince our community that traditional grades are not the best way to promote student learning, that you would support that?

11/15/06 2:21 PM  
Blogger Karl Fisch said...

Barb and Missy,

How well do you think we are currently doing at helping students to learn the foundations?

11/15/06 2:25 PM  
Blogger Karl Fisch said...

Michele,

Lots of folks say they are struggling with their 9th graders particularly (and some upperclassmen as well). So what can we do as a staff to address this issue? Or is it unsolvable or not worth solving?

11/15/06 2:28 PM  
Blogger C. Makovsky said...

This post caused me to flash back--to my first year of teaching, way back in 1974. At Arapahoe, there were people who were influenced (I assume) by the same ideas that influence you, Karl. Grades corrupt the essence of a student. Students hunger for knowledge, but evil grades stand in the way. Free kids from grades and they will become philosophers, mathematicians, poets, and historians. To free students from the tyrrany of grades, Arapahoe offered the Pass/Fail option for students in the Tuesday/Thursday classes. My own sister (10 years younger than I and a grade school and middle school student during the reforms that rocked education in the late 60's and early 70's) never knew a "grade." Her teachers--directed by the progressives in the school district--eliminated them. All that the kids received on their report cards was Pass or Fail.

I'm feeling a full-fledged rant coming on. I'll stop myself before I break my keyboard.

I just want to ask one question: WHY DO YOU SUPPOSE WE RETURNED TO GRADES?

11/15/06 4:41 PM  
Blogger Karl Fisch said...

Well Cheryl, I don't want to necessarily encourage a full-fledged rant, but it would be helpful if you could tell us a little bit more (maybe a partial-fledged rant?). Because I don't know why AHS returned to grades for those classes. I have some guesses, but they would only be guesses.

11/15/06 8:37 PM  
Blogger mferrill said...

Well, Karl--

Cheryl and I grew up during the same tumultuous period when every traditional aspect of education was questioned. And as I said in our meeting last Thursday, all of those revolutionary practices disappeared within the next decade. So Cheryl's question must be answered. Why did we return to grades?

On a philosophical level I believe in learning for the sake of learning--and as someone who is overwhelmed with grading, I would love to rid myself of that albatross. But practically, I know from experience it is human nature to take the shortest route toward completing a task. Just today, I gave a quiz in my AP class students were not prepared for. Monday night I told them to read Chaucer's "Pardoner's Tale" and expect a quiz on Tuesday. Yesterday, students were prepared and we held a meaningful discussion. Tuesday night I told them to read "The Wife of Bath's Tale" for today, but I did not tell them I would give a quiz. I didn't give a quiz to my first period class, so when I passed out a quiz to my fifth hour, they seemed surprised, and unfortunately, many of them had not read the story because they thought we would not have a quiz. Even in an honors class students often don't read unless they expect some sort of evaluation.

The same is true of our 21st Century class. You have been frustrated over the lack of on-line discussion. Members of our cohort are sincerely interested in the ideas you have generated during this program and we discuss these topics frequently in a variey of impromptu settings. However, if one of the reminder pop-ups appears on my screen just as I am shutting down my computer for the day (exhausted and rushing home to walk the dog, fix dinner,run erands and do more school-work) I probably won't blog unless I've specifically been asked to do so.

So--do I believe in doing away with grades if the community supports such a decision? I need to ponder that question a bit more. But my gut reaction is skeptical. I just don't think the majority of students will learn some of the basic, fundamental skills unless they are motivated through traditional feedback. Now, I would love for you to prove me wrong so let's keep the dialogue going!

11/15/06 8:46 PM  
Blogger Karl Fisch said...

Thanks Marlys.

Ahhh, human nature. This could be a really good discussion - over the next 10 years or so! But for now I'll limit myself to asking yet another question (my parents taught me to stick with my strengths). I agree that our students currently struggle at times with motivation without "the grade" hanging over them. But is that truly because it's human nature, or is it because we've trained them to be that way (I think one of my original points above)? Our students are currently so embedded in the current system that I think it's difficult to separate out their behavior from the system itself. Of course that doesn't necessarily mean that with a different system they would be different, but I don't think you can easily argue that because students currently require a grade for motivation that that is based completely in human nature. I think that is at least somewhat based on them figuring out what works in the current system.

On another note, from now on you (just you, Marlys) will be graded on your online participation. Notations will be made and will be placed in your permanent record. I will also notify PERA and I assume that the appropriate sanctions will be applied if your participation is not up to snuff. (Just in case it's not clear, this last paragraph is an attempt at humor.)

11/15/06 9:03 PM  
Blogger MollyG said...

I definitely agree. I love when my teachers give us enough freedom to learn how we normally would, but unfortunately this is not an ideal world. Learning for the sake of learning is a wonderful ideal, but it simply doesn't work in high school. I love learning, but no force on earth will ever make me care about verifying trigonometric identities. If it weren't for the grade, I would simply never, ever go to trig. But the grade keeps me there day after day. So I suppose one day when I'm offered a million dollars for knowing that sin squared plus cos squared equals one, I will be glad that I'm forced to take trig. As high school students, it is unrealistic to expect us to be fully motivated to learn about topics of someone else's choice. Being well rounded and prepared for the world means that most of us still need to be forced to learn some things. No human on earth is always motivated to learn or work hard. Even you teachers. Imagine that you were still expected to blog every day or teach 4 or 5 classes a day, except they were about how to do dishes or fill out tax forms. Would you still be motivated to participate or teach with passion? This is sometimes how we feel as students. We are herded into a big brick building with 2000 others at an ungodly hour in the morning, and then we are expected to be awake and passionate about conjugate acids and bases. This is where the constructivism comes in. Sometimes it is really nice to be in control of at least a little bit of our education. But at other times, it is too much. Teachers just need to develop a sense of when enough is enough and when to temporarily revert back to the old ways when you told us what to do. We are still students. As much as I would love to believe that everyone my age is mature enough to take control of their own education, it would be a false hope.
That balance is what we should aim for. Last year I was in Ms. Kakos' class, one of the most constructivist classes. It was all new to us and we all adored it. And now I'm in Mrs. Ferrill's class which is very different, but equally valuable. Kakos let us take the reins and she would only step in when we needed guidance. It worked well and was a great class for sophomore year. Ferrill's style is more traditional, we take notes and she shows us how to do things on the board. But it's equally valuable. Teachers are there for a reason, students may be able to do a lot on our own, but there are things that just need to be taught. I appreciate having a teacher with so much experience that she can pass on to us. So even if we don't always guide our own learning, we are learning new things just as effectively as in last year's class. There is no right way to do all this. Each teacher just needs to be openminded and find what works for each class.

11/15/06 10:54 PM  
Blogger mferrill said...

Thanks, Karl and Molly!

Karl, your response made me laugh out loud; and Molly, you need to enter some of your passionate blogging responses in more writing contests. What about the CLAS contest about "passion"?

11/16/06 3:27 PM  
Blogger C. Makovsky said...

Karl,

It’s hard to reduce the issue of grades to a small rant….I won’t even try. But I’ll answer your question about why Arapahoe dropped the pass/fail option. We dropped it because kids gradually stopped choosing that option. Why? Well, because the pass/fail option wasn’t well-respected by colleges.

And why didn’t colleges (bastions of idealism—and the source, I’m sure, of all “constructivist” theories) respect the option? Because when a kid knows that his grade will be PASS if he scores a 60% or 70% or 80% or 90% or 100%, only the lazy kids—those who planned to do just enough to get a 60% or a 70% selected that option. No one—not the teachers, not the students, not the colleges—believed that a student chose Pass/Fail because he was in love with learning, because he wanted to soar, because he wanted to challenge himself, because he was finally free of the tyranny of a grade. No, he chose the option because he didn’t want to finish his homework. He didn’t want to read. He didn’t want to write. He wanted a credit.

I don’t remember being impressed by a single kid who opted out. I recall nothing interesting or creative about their contributions to my Tuesday/Thursday classes. The pass/fail students were invariably lackadaisical in their approach to learning.

I suppose the original intent of the no-grades option was to encourage students to explore new subjects without endangering their grade point averages. But for some reason the theory—as with so many other 1960’s theories—soured when brought into the real world.

When I first began teaching, the buzz words in education were RELEVANT and INDIVIDUALIZATION. I remember that we taught contemporary, “popular” novels such as Gordon Parks’ The Learning Tree. I don’t think we taught Shakespeare. The kids just weren’t interested in Shakespeare. It wasn’t relevant. Instead of Socratic Seminars, we had “rap sessions” where the kids sat in a circle and emoted and “related” to the literature we were reading.

Oh, Oh. The full-fledged rant is coming on again. Time to stop.

11/16/06 10:19 PM  
Blogger Karl Fisch said...

Thanks Cheryl.

An observation about my original post and then some musings on Pass/Fail.

First, the observation. My original post was about trying to give students more control - and responsibility - over their own learning. When I mentioned grades, I said "I believe that if we can remove the emphasis on grades and refocus on learning, students more often than not will choose the most interesting and personally relevant assignment." Nowhere did I suggest eliminating grades - that suggestion was contributed by Marlys. While eliminating grades is certainly one way to remove the emphasis on grades, I think there are also many others. We've talked a lot in both cohort 1 and cohort 2 after our discussions with Tony Winger about restructuring our grades to provide better feedback to students. So removing the emphasis on grades could also mean things like changing the way we report out grades to provide better feedback, or looking at zeroes and accepting late work for important assignments and only lowering their "responsibility" grade, or having separate grades for for the academic content and responsibility/citizenship, or eliminating the focus on GPA, or simply having lots and lots of discussions with our students about the purpose of school/learning, or many, many other possibilities. I don't think there is one magic bullet that will accomplish this, but I think if we attack the problem in multiple ways we may have some success in refocusing our students on the learning.

Now, some musings on Pass/Fail. Let me state up front that I am not trying to second guess how AHS implemented Pass/Fail back in the seventies - I wasn't here and I don't know all the thoughts and discussions that went into it. Let me also state that I'm not proposing we implement Pass/Fail now. I'm just trying to think through how I might try to implement Pass/Fail if I was tasked with doing that.

First, a little bit of personal history. The college I went to had Pass/Fail grading for freshmen year, so I have a little bit of personal knowledge of this. The stated intention was to reduce stress for freshmen and - surprise - to try to get them to focus more on the learning and less on the grade. I don't have any hard data on how well the college felt that worked, only my own anecdotal data. My anecdotal data suggests mixed results. I think it did reduce stress for freshmen and did help them focus more on what they were learning and less on the grade (based on my circle of friends, anyway). But it was hamstrung by several factors. Everyone knew that after freshmen year we would go back to having grades and everyone had been well trained in K-12 to focus on grades. As a result, the college had a process in place where students could find out what their grade "would be" if we weren't on pass fail. So, naturally, many students took advantage of that option to know how they were "really" doing. I think all of that contributed to undermining the stated purposes somewhat, but I don't think it was a total waste.

Now, looking back at the way AHS implemented Pass/Fail, I think there are some things I would've questioned. First, it sounds like it really wasn't pass/fail across the board, but that students could choose to get a grade or to go pass/fail. If that's accurate, I think that skews the entire process right there due to adverse selection principles. Second, if it was also just limited to Tuesday/Thursday classes, then I think that undermined the entire process by making those classes appear less "academic" or "important". Third, it sounds like Pass/Fail was still based on a traditional points system with 60% designated as "passing." I think that is another example of trying to graft a new strategy onto a system that it's not compatible with. Students are so embedded in a system that rewards points that simply slapping pass/fail on top of it isn't going to change the focus. And if 60% was really what was required to pass, then I would argue again that students were simply making the logical choice to put the bare minimum effort into those classes to get the P, and putting more effort into classes where they could get the A or B. Again, it puts the focus on the grade, not the learning, especially if the all-important GPA's were still present.

So, if I were going to try to implement a Pass/Fail system, I think it would require a lot of thought and need to be designed as a completely new system, not grafted onto the old system. I certainly haven't devoted the time to thinking about this that I would if truly tasked with implementing this, but here are some initial thoughts (subject to revision should I ever have to really think about or defend this, in which case I would devote the necessary time to it).

First, I would think it would have to be all classes and all students, not just some classes and some students. Second, I think it would have to be based on something other than "points." Third, I think the criteria for "passing" would certainly be something very different than "60%," something more along the lines of demonstrated proficiency in the essential learnings for the course. Fourth, I think it would need to be combined with a very different schema for assessment of and feedback to students. There are probably several other key factors, but I think those four would be a good starting point.

These are just some thoughts, but I'm sure "I am not bound to please thee with my answers." :-)

11/17/06 8:51 AM  
Blogger Karl Fisch said...

Molly, thanks as always for your thoughtful comments.

I agree that there is no one right way to teach, and that multiple approaches are key. I also agree that it's not an ideal world, but I would disagree that it can't work in high school. It maybe can't work in it's purest form, but I think we can get much closer to it than we currently are. I think both your trig example and your example about teaching about how to do dishes actually help prove the point to some degree. If we can't justify why we are teaching these things, then why are we teaching these things? And I also think that we are so used to "the system" as it currently is that sometimes it's difficult to imagine how it could be different. But many of the great breakthroughs in the history of the human race have been brought about by those that imagined something different, by those that refused to accept the status quo and asked why things can't be better. "There are those that look at things the way they are, and ask why? I dream of things that never were, and ask why not?"

And, just because I can't help myself, let me focus on trig and trig identities for a moment. I'm thinking your million dollar payday for that probably isn't going to come anytime soon. I think trig is very valuable for a small number of people, but there are many other math classes that would be better for most students. (Probability and statistics comes to mind - I think those concepts are critical to be an informed citizen in this data-driven age). These classes would certainly include some trig concepts in them, but probably not trig identities.

And here's the bigger problem. Soon all students who want to go to a state college or university in Colorado will have to take and pass trig and pre-calc (because the Colorado Commission on Higher Education is mandating four years of math, algebra and above for admission to Colorado colleges). And there is even some semi-serious discussion of then making that a graduation requirement for AHS. So, look around at your fellow students and tell me that all of them need to - and would be successful at - taking trig/pre-calc just so that they can attend college (much less if they have to do it just to graduate high school). This is what I'll call "false rigor" for lack of a better term. That simply requiring students to take more and harder classes will magically improve our educational system, without addressing the underlying causes for why students aren't being successful. (I would not-so-modestly propose that we do not impose any requirements on students that both teachers and state/federal legislators can't demonstrate proficiency in - whether that be CSAP, ACT, NCLB or specific classes like trig/pre-calc). I believe we need to look both at what we can do to help students be successful learners, and at the skills they will need to be successful in the 21st century (which are not necessarily the same as the ones they needed to be successful in the 20th century). And I think trying to shift the focus from grades to learning - and trying to give students more control over and responsibility for their own learning - is a good place to start.

11/17/06 9:20 AM  
Blogger Lary Kleeman said...

Not to derail the conversation, but I did want to respond to the idea that our students will rise to the occasion when given the choice or choices concerning their education.

Case in point is my Comprehensive English class (also known as Basic Skills Juniors). When given the choice to select three words to give to the rest of the class after reading aloud a section of Fallen Angels, every student, all twenty seven, selected higher level words for the rest of us to write down. It was impressive, to say the least. After we collected all of these words, each student used them in a creative response to the novel.

11/17/06 11:03 AM  
Blogger Barbara S. said...

Ooooh! I love the conversation!

11/22/06 5:55 PM  

Post a Comment

Wednesday, November 08, 2006

Photo Story 3 Tutorial Screencast

Several of our teachers are having students use Photo Story (or something of their own choosing) to create digital stories. I developed a quick overview handout for Photo Story and then did a couple of quick training sessions with classes. After repeating myself a few times, I decided maybe it was worth it (and good practice for me) to create a screencast that our students (and teachers) could watch if they wanted to learn the basics of Photo Story. It turned out okay, other than being a little too long (it's 11 minutes) and a little rough around the edges. It's also a very large file, so it takes a couple of minutes to load the screencast, even over broadband, but I thought I'd share it in case anyone else could use it.

Flash Version (better quality, but takes a while to load).

Windows Media Player Version (13 MB, quality is not as good, but it is downloadable).

Add this post to Del.icio.us

2 Comments:

Blogger Barbara S. said...

I watched it and it was very informative. Thanks, Karl, for sharing your expertise.

11/8/06 6:20 PM  
Blogger mferrill said...

Michele showed me the sample photo story she created for her English Literature students using one of the pilgrims from The Canterbury Tales. It was fabulous, and I want to try this some time! How much time does it take students to learn this information and then create their own stories?

11/8/06 7:47 PM  

Post a Comment

Monday, November 06, 2006

This is Montag's Brain on PowerPoint

I sometimes forget how creative our students can be using software that us older folks think of as "productivity" software. Take a look at these examples of student work using Microsoft Word and PowerPoint to illustrate their understanding of the characters in Fahrenheit 451. I especially like these examples because they received no "instruction" on Word or PowerPoint. They were just given the assignment and could decide how best to complete it - they took it from there.

Add this post to Del.icio.us

1 Comments:

Blogger Lindsay Donaldson said...

Anne Smith is my HERO!!!!! Seeing those projects....wow. Got my gears turning.

11/9/06 4:44 PM  

Post a Comment